Towards Measurable Intelligent Inference Position paper on the future of legal argumentation with cases in AI&Law
نویسنده
چکیده
Research on modeling legal argumentation with cases has explored various ways to represent cases and arguments about them. Strong connections to computational models of argument exist with regard to representation and inference/semantics. While many insights have been gained, I will argue in this short paper that, from the perspective of a potential future user of a legal-case-argumentation tool, the state of the art in the field does not yet enable the development of systems capable of drawing intelligent and useful inferences from available knowledge. In order to tackle this challenge, I advocate for a more detailed exploration of value-based/purposive reasoning and the corresponding knowledge representation problems as well as for a commitment to an implementation and empirical evaluation of developed formalisms.
منابع مشابه
On how AI & law can help autonomous systems obey the law: a position paper
In this position paper I discuss to what extent current and past AI & law research is relevant for research on autonomous intelligent systems that exhibit legally relevant behaviour. After a brief review of the history of AI & law, I will compare the problems faced by autonomous intelligent systems with the problems faced by lawyers in traditional legal settings. This should give insights into ...
متن کاملArguing with Dimensions in Legal Cases
In this short paper we introduce some novel arguments based on legal cases represented as sets of dimensions. Although there has been much work on arguments based on factors, there has been relatively little recent work which has exploited dimensional representations. The arguments that we consider have a flavour quite distinct from those generated from cases represented as factors, which lack ...
متن کاملAI and Legal Reasoning
This paper presents a summary of the responses of a panel to issues on AI and legal reasoning. The panel consisted Among the issues addressed by the panel were: 1. What are the characteristics of the legal domain that make it interesting or amenable to AI approaches-what is special about it; 2. The open-textured nature of legal concepts and the implications this has for using Al-techniques, esp...
متن کاملTeaching Case-Based Argumentation through a Model and Examples Empirical Evaluation of an Intelligent Learning Environment
CATO is an intelligent learning environment, designed to help beginning law students learn basic skills of making arguments with cases. Working with CATO, students outline written arguments about legal problems, supported by cites to cases selected from CATO’s database. CATO employs an abstract model of case-based legal argument to generate argumentation examples dynamically in the context of t...
متن کاملAI and Law: A fruitful synergy
AI and Law is a classic field for AI research: it poses difficult and interesting problems for AI, and its projects inform both AI and its focal domain, the law itself. This special issue reports on a range of projects, from those where the law motivates fundamental research and whose results reach beyond the legal domain, to those that partake of the benefits of techniques and wisdom from AI a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013